L'Ange masque. Traite de l'intelligible et du sensible : Coincidence |
|
A COINCIDENCE IS A FUSION OF AN OBJECTIVE WORLD AND A SUBJECTIVE WORLD. THE ME IS A NON-COINCIDENCE. DEMONSTRATE THAT AN EXISTING COINCIDENCE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE
THAT IT DOES NOT EXIST. GOD IS THE COINCIDENCE OF GOD AND SATAN. SATAN IS WILLING OF NON-COINCIDENCE AND RESEARCH OF GOD.
I call coincidentally the fusion of an objective world and a subjective world. This fusion is neither a world nor the other, participating both at the same time. It is a world and the other, and a third, united in a common meaning, both expressible and inexpressible, rational and irrational, meaning moving and predictable at any moment, meaning without signs: breath, renewal of creation. I call the human condition the place of cohabitation of an objective world and a subjective world that do not coincide. When there is no coincidence, it is the emperor, when there is total coincidence it is the crucified. Between the two, the human comedy. In short, death and resurrection say: I am coincidence. The man is free. In short, life can only die. Man is not free. I call God the coincidence of the objective universe and the subjective universe. The result (God being coincidence) that to prove that there exists would be to prove that it does not exist. We have not succeeded yet. The known proofs of the existence of God are proofs of the existence of the irrational or of the derailing of the irrational, vain attempts to introduce reason into what escapes it. They want a first cause. And why is a mystery situated in the origin of times, this fiction, more advantageous to them than the immediate mystery? Because this pile of time behind them is the mark of their safety. The immediate mystery is an immediate coincidence of the objective universe and the subjective universe, their not me. They say God and the Universe, not to die to themselves. They demonstrate the existence of God to convince themselves that coincidence is not for them. Not now. Not here, like that, standing up. READ Seth, the third son of Adam I call Satan the will of non-coincidence within God. If it did not exist, and since every will concurs, there would be no coincidence and action, but indifferent identity. Satan is the safeguard of coincidence. I call Satan ignorance of coincidence within God. If it did not exist, there would be no knowledge, because this one knows itself only by the perception of which is not it. To think "to be" without thinking "non-being" is unthinkable. To think "to be" and to think "non-being" is unthinkable. Only non-coincidences are thinkable. Being in the act of saying "to be" utters the mysterious negation of the negation that denies it creates it. The coincidence is known coincidence knowing the non-coincidence. She knows herself by essence, she knows herself because she is not an identity of opposites but a coincidental existence of oppositions that are created to deny each other. I call essence of coincidence its movement. His approach is resolution in opposites: birth by death. |
| Article published by EzoOccult the Hermès Webzine and updated on: January 4, 2016 : Source |
|
Princess Sofia : Meat and Bones and Coincidence |